Custom comparison · Any two tools
Compare any two AI tools
Select any two tools from our reviewed collection and get an instant side-by-side comparison.
VS
Runway
82/100
Very Good · MFWAI Score
| Starting price | $15/mo |
| Pricing model | Credit-based |
| Free tier | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✗ |
| Category | AI Video Generation |
Top pros
- Gen-4.5 ranked #1 on Artificial Analysis text-to-video leaderboard (1,247 Elo, verified November 2025)
- Used in production on major films — the quality ceiling is the highest available in 2026
- Multiple generation modes: text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video, and lip-sync
Key cons
- No native audio generation — a significant gap versus Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 which include sound
- Credit system is restrictive: Gen-4.5 costs 25 credits per second, so 625 Standard credits produce around 25 seconds of footage
Bolt.new
79/100
Good · MFWAI Score
| Starting price | $25/mo |
| Pricing model | Token-based |
| Free tier | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✗ |
| Category | AI App Building |
Top pros
- WebContainers technology runs a complete Node.js environment entirely in the browser — no local setup required
- Bolt v2 (October 2025) introduced autonomous debugging that reduced error loops by 98% in internal testing
- GitHub sync lets developers export, own, and maintain the generated code independently of the platform
Key cons
- Token-based pricing is harder to predict than credit systems — heavy prompting sessions can exhaust quotas unexpectedly
- Complex application logic still struggles — multi-page apps with intricate state management frequently require manual intervention
// Quick verdict
Runway (AI Video Generation) and Bolt.new (AI App Building) serve different purposes — this is less about which is better and more about which job you need done. Runway scores 82/100 and starts at $15/mo; Bolt.new scores 79/100 and starts at $25/mo. If your primary need falls into ai video generation, go with Runway. If you need ai app building capabilities, Bolt.new is your tool.